The effectiveness of petitions
1. The task word ‘discuss’ require students to consider both sides of something. In this case, ‘discussing’ the use of petitions as a means by which individuals can influence law reform requires students to write about factors related to how effective or ineffective petitions are. Responses will vary according to the arguments selected.
2. The task word ‘evaluate’ require students to consider both sides of something, as well as express an opinion judging the relative strengths of the arguments. For example, a student might argue, based on evidence, that while petitions might have some impact, they are largely an ineffective means for influencing law reform. In this case, ‘evaluating’ petitions as an effective means for the individual to have a meaningful impact on the law in Australiarequires students to write about points related to effectiveness and points related to ineffectiveness.
For example, in relation to contact with law-makers, a petition provides direct contact between the individuals or groups seeking change in the law and those responsible for making the law. This is because the petition is usually sent to a specific law-maker or to a standing committee on petitions. However, while petitions do have direct contact with parliament. Parliament can be overwhelmed by petitions. This dilutes the effect of any one petition. Further, parliament has many other items of business to attend to. Even though petitions are tabled in parliament, they receive little time and attention. Overall, while petitions can result in contact with law-makers, they will be largely ineffective if they receive little time and attention.